So cracked has another article about gun control.
Now Cracked has a funny thing where the url gives a different title
Huh.... well that's telling.
Let's go over their list
#5. We Worry Most About Guns Criminals Use The Least
#4. We Barely Even Mention Suicide
#3. We Pretend Background Checks Will Fix Everything
#2. We Don't Think About Logistics
#1. We Forget What Country We're In
So mentioning a myopic focus on "scary looking guns", lumping in suicides to goose crime stats, acting as if background checks would be a magic cure-all, ignoring the thorny issues of enforcement, and the nature of the US.
Oh and then there's this
Basically, no one at any level of our current gun crisis is going to part with their weapons as freely as Australians did. Gun violence of all sorts was already on the decline in that country when the stricter laws were put in place. Whether the stricter gun laws even had an impact on homicide rates still seems like a question that hasn't quite been answered yet.
That's right, they can't even claim that Australia's mass confiscation actually reduced homicide rates.
So the answer to "Why we can't Australia away the gun problem" is... the Australia solution still had millions of guns out in circulation, requires a much more pliant populace, and might not have even reduced homicides.
Hence another reason why gun owners resist.
And amazingly... the article ends on crime reduction plans that aren't gun control.
Though just to show that they're cracked they still spitball about some touchy feely gun control
Maybe we could toss a few mandatory safety features onto the guns we sell going forward to make them safer to keep around the house, thus (ideally) reducing the number of accidental gun deaths each year as well.
Just keep in ind #2 applies to safety features as well.
Obviously, even if we did all of those things it wouldn't fix the problem completely. That said, any one of those things would make more sense than our current strategy of making guns an all-or-nothing proposition where we either have to ban them entirely or freely carry them around in public without restrictions of any sort.
Oh bless your heart.
But this does show the last refuge of the gun control advocate. They go "Oh I don't want to ban all guns! Let's compromise!"
We're never going to go for either one of those options, so we have to find some kind of middle ground at some point. Shifting our focus away from ridding the country of guns completely and more toward combating the reasons why we point them at each other (and ourselves) so often might be the way to do it.
Told you. Still, grading on a curve this is a big jump on Cracke's part.
Oh and for the compromise bit... you think the writers will oppose any new Assault Weapons Bans? Like say the one percolating in Washington State?
Or would they agree to a "compromise" legislation that has mental health reforms & safe storage liability in exchange for overturning AWBs?