So Bill Clinton wants a repeal of the 22nd Amendment.
Lovely.
Well he's a bit behind the curve. Rep. José Serrano wanted this before Obama was even sworn in.
Well, at least Obama doesn't want to be president-for-life.
Tuesday, November 8, 2011
A good Cause.
Going into Veteran's day there's a lot of things you can donate too and support.
I'll at another one. Bring Chuck Home.
Raising funds to bring a soldier's adopted dog back home from Afghanistan.
I'll at another one. Bring Chuck Home.
Raising funds to bring a soldier's adopted dog back home from Afghanistan.
Sunday, November 6, 2011
Just as planned.
You know... this is making it real hard to see Fast and Furious as anything other than an excuse for more gun control.
And isn't that a classic example of flogging the peasants because the princes were bad.
Agents of the State illegally ship weapons to Mexico and the Democrats demand that private citizens need tighter regulation. Yeah... sounds like the antis all right.
And isn't that a classic example of flogging the peasants because the princes were bad.
Agents of the State illegally ship weapons to Mexico and the Democrats demand that private citizens need tighter regulation. Yeah... sounds like the antis all right.
What kind of movement needs anti-rape shelters?
OWS needs women only tents to keep down on the rape and sexual abuse.
Classy.
Talk about rebuilding from day one. They've got the basic tenants of state-sanctioned force and the risk of harriers and bandits absconding and abusing women.
Soon they'll discover agriculture.
Also this is in New York City where legal ownership of self defense tools (from handguns to even tasers and such) is only for agents of the state and the very highest of the elite.
But why would someone need a tool that can inflict massive pain and physical damage no mater the physique of the user?
Allahpundit stresses the seriousness.
Remember this next time you hear the media click their tongues over a protest they don't like or when they gush over one they do like.
Via Insty.
Classy.
The large, metal-framed “safety tent” — which will be guarded by an all-female patrol — can accommodate as many as 18 people and will be used during the day for women-only meetings, said Occupy Wall Street organizers.
Talk about rebuilding from day one. They've got the basic tenants of state-sanctioned force and the risk of harriers and bandits absconding and abusing women.
Soon they'll discover agriculture.
Also this is in New York City where legal ownership of self defense tools (from handguns to even tasers and such) is only for agents of the state and the very highest of the elite.
But why would someone need a tool that can inflict massive pain and physical damage no mater the physique of the user?
Allahpundit stresses the seriousness.
Let it sink in: Their protests now need rape shelters. This is actually happening. And New York City lets it go on.
...
This can’t be repeated enough: With a few exceptions, foremost among them the New York Post, the coverage of OWS protests compared to the coverage of tea-party protests is the worst media double standard in recent history. Nothing compares, because nothing else involves this much distortion on both ends of the coverage. It’s not just that most press outlets (like the protesters themselves) look the other way at depravity happening inside Obamaville, it’s that for years they treated the tea-party movement as some sort of feral mob that was forever on the brink of rampaging through the streets — like, say, Occupy Oakland just did. If you missed it when I posted it last week, go watch the ad the DNC ran in August 2009 when tea partiers first started showing up to town halls on ObamaCare. That set the tone. We began the year with tea-party pols being smeared as killers over a shooting they had nothing to do with and we end it with actual rapes being shrugged off by the press because they’re bad PR for a movement they support. Disgrace.
Remember this next time you hear the media click their tongues over a protest they don't like or when they gush over one they do like.
Via Insty.
Friday, November 4, 2011
This time, this TIME! It'll work!
Totalitarian Hope Springs Eternal
Well, surely these folks ccan master the implementation.
Nope, not so much
Clearly, the problem is that they don't have enough power to enforce their ideas.
Via: The Morning Jolt and Ace
Hey, remember when the Tea Partiers went around breaking into buildings to vandalise them and had to be scared off by armed property owners?
This compilation of old hippies pining for revolution amongst college kids who simply don’t want to make their own way is the unsurprising result of liberalism in America today. This is what happens when children are fed faux lessons in self esteem and tolerance from broken family systems and then taught in school that the theory of communism is noble, if only the implementation could be mastered. American students are engulfed in a sea of liberalism from kindergarten through university, often void of any opposing views and without prompting to study the historical precedent and common sense consequences of the ideology with which they’re being indoctrinated.
Well, surely these folks ccan master the implementation.
Nope, not so much
In a hilariously idiotic display of irony, Occupy Wall Street is experiencing firsthand the failure of the system they are clamoring for. They squabbled over how to properly distribute the over half a million dollars in donations they received. Some people felt they deserved more because they were doing more activist work, versus those who spent their occupying days playing drum circles or doing, well, nothing. What's incredible is that the same people arguing over how to redistribute the wealth given them are pushing for a complete American system of wealth redistribution. They see no correlation between their own inability to "fairly" distribute money and that government mandated wealth distribution would just assuredly fail as well, but on a massive, nation-shaking economic scale.
Clearly, the problem is that they don't have enough power to enforce their ideas.
Via: The Morning Jolt and Ace
Hey, remember when the Tea Partiers went around breaking into buildings to vandalise them and had to be scared off by armed property owners?
Thursday, November 3, 2011
Nanny Bloomberg's "Cheap" Date
Indy Mayoral candidate Melina Kennedy doesn't seem to realize the limitations of her office.
Two big planks of her platform are "fixing the schools" and controlling those evil guns.
Problem is that Indianapolis schools are not under the control of the Mayor.
And neither is gun laws, since Indiana passed a state level preemption law banning any locality from making their own laws.
But that hasn't stopped Melina Kennedy!
Now she's attacking the incumbent Ballard for... not being in Mayors Against Illegal Guns!
Yes how dare he not be in an organization with a membership more likely to commit crime than the population at large, which is involved in illegal "sting" operations, and is really Mayor Bloomberg's gun control mouth piece.
And by pure coincidence guess who got 25 large from Bloomberg just before she started this new line of attack.
Classy.
Hat tip to Roberta and Tam
Two big planks of her platform are "fixing the schools" and controlling those evil guns.
Problem is that Indianapolis schools are not under the control of the Mayor.
And neither is gun laws, since Indiana passed a state level preemption law banning any locality from making their own laws.
But that hasn't stopped Melina Kennedy!
Now she's attacking the incumbent Ballard for... not being in Mayors Against Illegal Guns!
Yes how dare he not be in an organization with a membership more likely to commit crime than the population at large, which is involved in illegal "sting" operations, and is really Mayor Bloomberg's gun control mouth piece.
And by pure coincidence guess who got 25 large from Bloomberg just before she started this new line of attack.
Classy.
Hat tip to Roberta and Tam
Wednesday, November 2, 2011
More Magic!
Eugene Kane frets about Wisconsin joining the bulk of America.
Sebastian at his new digs at Shall Not be Questioned looks at the fear:
He's brimming with fear of all those proles being able to legally carry concealed now (nevermind that they could have illegally carried concealed or legally open carried previously...)
But then it gets silly:
Seriously? He actually thinks that a sign would stop someone intent on harm? How?
In what world would a person who is willing to risk a murder rap be unwilling to risk an armed trespass charge?
Maybe the world of magic.
I guess it's a good thing these guys didn't use guns to destroy the french magazine Charlie Hebdo's offices.
I'm seeing the publication equivalent of Wee'rd "Gun Death" series.
Though Time's taking a novel approach on that story.
Time Magazine Writer: That French Magazine knew what it was doing tarting itself up with that short skirt, high heels, and walking past those men. She knew they couldn't control themselves.
Ace looks into the original headline of the article.
And we'll round out by going back to Wee'rd on the antis. They want you less free, less informed, and less able to defend yourself. But they're all about empowering criminals. Because it's not their fault they did bad things.
Sebastian at his new digs at Shall Not be Questioned looks at the fear:
I also wonder why Eugene Kane is so fearful of his fellow citizens and co-workers. Do you think as soon as you put a gun in someone’s hands they magically turn into murderers? Are people in Minnesota, which has a lower violent crime rate than Wisconsin, less safe because they have allowed shall-issue carry permits for years? What about Iowa, who’s violent crime rate is roughly the same as Wisconsin and also has shall-issue carry?
He's brimming with fear of all those proles being able to legally carry concealed now (nevermind that they could have illegally carried concealed or legally open carried previously...)
But then it gets silly:
Thankfully, the “No Weapons Allowed in the Building” sign has been posted at my job, which was a great relief for some of us who write the kind of stories that occasionally get the public agitated.
Seriously? He actually thinks that a sign would stop someone intent on harm? How?
In what world would a person who is willing to risk a murder rap be unwilling to risk an armed trespass charge?
Maybe the world of magic.
I guess it's a good thing these guys didn't use guns to destroy the french magazine Charlie Hebdo's offices.
I'm seeing the publication equivalent of Wee'rd "Gun Death" series.
Though Time's taking a novel approach on that story.
Time Magazine Writer: That French Magazine knew what it was doing tarting itself up with that short skirt, high heels, and walking past those men. She knew they couldn't control themselves.
Ace looks into the original headline of the article.
Like I said, the web-based headline -- that continues in the URL -- is:
firebombed-french-paper-a-victim-of-islamistsor-its-own-obnoxious-islamophobia/
So the original headline was: "Firebombed French Paper: A Victim of Islam, Or Its Own Obnoxious Islamaphobia?"
And we'll round out by going back to Wee'rd on the antis. They want you less free, less informed, and less able to defend yourself. But they're all about empowering criminals. Because it's not their fault they did bad things.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)