Monday, October 6, 2008

Questioning Obama

Finnaly Palin digs into Obama.

"Tell them about the real Barack Obama"
Ace comments:
I'll tell you what: when I read that, I almost want to cry because it cuts right to the heart of how frustrating and maddening it is that this guy seems to be coasting to victory while most of the country knows nothing about how shady his background is, from the shoddiness of his record to the loathesomeness of his church to the sleaziness of his business associates.


More thoughts on why people are so... enamored with the One.

Here, after all, is a man who is a distillation of Jimmy Carter, George McGovern, and Bill "the bomber" Ayres. On taxes. On foreign policy. On free speech. On government entitlements. On all this and more Obama is the most left-wing candidate in the history of the Republic. And yet he is greeted with open arms not only by self-confessed revolutionaries like Bill Ayres but by Mom and Pop Democrat in a taxing district near you.
How do you explain it?
...
The liberal says: "We have sinned. We are guilty. Please absolve us of our wrong."
Team Obama says, "Sure, but it's going to cost you."



Mark R. Levin notes the scary double standard:
If John McCain had belonged to a church for 20 years and that church advocated white supremacy and the pastor of the church spewed racist propaganda wrapped in Biblical verses — much of which was caught on video-tape — what would we say? If McCain's good friends included people involved in blowing up abortion clinics instead of the Capitol Building, the Pentagon, and police stations, what would we say? If McCain was socially close to a professor with ties to neo-Nazi groups in Berlin, as opposed to a professor who had ties to the PLO, what would we say? If McCain spent his formative years schooled in fascism as opposed to Marxism, what would we say?


And here's 20 Questions you won't here the MSM ask about Obama.

They want to run out the clock, and keep Americans ignorant of what Obama has done.
Yuval Levin also notes it
Very soon after she was picked to be McCain's running mate, Sarah Palin was attacked by Obama campaign spokesmen and a Democratic member of Congress for once being seen wearing a Pat Buchanan button. She had an answer and the campaign offered it. Yet now we are asked to believe that it's somehow inappropriate to inquire why Barack Obama's political career began in the home of an admitted and unrepentant domestic terrorist of the radical left? "Who is Barack Obama?" is not an irrelevant question given the job Obama is seeking, and it's a question he has sought mightily to avoid answering. The veil of secrecy he has thrown over his past (journalists have been denied access to his state legislative office records, documents about state earmarks he distributed in Illinois, a list of his legal clients, his state bar application, billing records related to Tony Rezko, medical records, academic records—all of which are the sort of documents candidates routinely make public) forces the question all the more.


Is Obama mainstream?
Follow the link to see a list and think for yourself.


Via Rand Simberg, Abe Greenwald looks at the Ayers thing from another angle

Even if Obama's preposterous new claim about not knowing who Bill Ayers was was true in 1995, was it true in 1997 when Obama, then state senator, endorsed Ayers's book? Had he not yet found out the identity of his buddy by 2000, when he took the position serving with Ayers on the board of the Woods Fund? Did no one slip him a note over the next two years reading, "Don't indicate that you're reading this note, but the guy next to you is a terrorist"? Frankly, if Obama didn't find out that Bill Ayers is a terrorist until it came up during the primary, then there's more to worry about than the candidate's political leanings.


That's the twisted part, the only honest defense Obama has is that he was a rube that didn't bother to look into the past of those he associated with, even merely to consider the political fallout.

It's like the guy doesn't expect anyone to ever question him. Though givne the media's preformance...

Sunday, October 5, 2008

Things you can't question about Obama

Glen Reynolds notes something:

IF YOU CRITICIZE BARACK OBAMA OVER BILL AYERS, it's because you're a racist!

Well, of course. If you criticize Barack Obama over anything, it's because you're a racist. No doubt that'll hold true if he's elected President, too, which will call for strict anti-racism laws to keep such things under control . . . .


Anyone that's followed how the Obama camp handles critism would see a very worrying pattern.

And for fun add in the other totalitarian imagery and songs and thugishness.

Lovely.

Saturday, October 4, 2008

Camp Obama

The Obama campaign is setting up special camps to teach people how to be agitators and such.

It's like this guy wants to be a totalitarian ruler.

Hmmm....

Friday, October 3, 2008

Bill Whittle: The Blob.

Whittle shows how our government bloats things and just how dangerous it is.

Laws are being passed that no one understands or has even read. That's scary.

Wednesday, October 1, 2008

The Bear tries something new

Russia's novel idea to renew the lease on the Crimea: The carrot.

They're gonna tempt the Ukraine with contracts to build aircraft carriers.

So much for Moderators being... moderate.

The "moderator" to the VP debate has a book coming out, on Jan 20th... talking about how wonderful the Obama presidency would be.
Malkin has more

Ifill and her publisher are banking on an Obama/Biden win to buoy her book sales. The moderator expected to treat both sides fairly has grandiosely declared this the "Age of Obama." Can you imagine a right-leaning journalist writing a book about the "stunning" McCain campaign and its "bold" path to reform timed for release on Inauguration Day — and then expecting a slot as a moderator for the nation's sole vice presidential debate?


Not only does Ifill have an ideological reason to be biased but she has a finanical one too. Great selection.

Jay Nordlinger's a bit more cynical on it.
People say, "Well, isn't Gwen Ifill pro-Obama?" And the answer is: "If she is, is she more so than any other suitable MSM big?"

At any rate — no pouting or fretting. Play on.


Sure it would be hard to find an unbiased person, but could you at least pick someone who doesn't have a book deal ridding on the outcome?

Related: Michael Silence on double standards

Palin has been running for just over a month. Obama has been running for more than 18 months. So I did a search on Yahoo News;
Palin and experience: 13,538 results
Obama and experience: 15,074 results


At least he didn't normalize by months running.
Which I will.
Palin and experience: 9,025 results per month
Obama and experience: 837 results per month
Order of magnitude and against someone going for the VP slot.

Wacky 3rd Parties

With Obama freely using Totalitarian imagery and propaganda styles, what's a 3rd Party crank to do?

Claim the National Gaurd killed thousands and dumped the boddies in a swamp.

Ah the Green Party. Remember, they want to save the Earth. Whether you want them to or not.

On a related note Some thoughts on the creepy pace of the environmental movement.

Imagine the media reaction if a prominent American Christian leader condoned vandalism at abortion clinics. Now imagine the reaction if he went beyond condoning vandalism and agreed to appear as a witness for the defense at the trial of those vandals.

Then imagine what would happen if he decided to export his religiously motivated crusade to another country.

Well, that's exactly what just happened, except the religion wasn't Christianity — it was environmentalism. . . .

What happened in England is further proof of what author Michael Crichton meant when he called modern environmentalism "one of the most powerful religions in the Western World" — a religion that divides the world between "sinner" or "saved," the "side of salvation" or the "side of doom.