This is a heartfelt article on a parent's loss and the nature of how conspiracy theories work.
Not much to criticize about that.
But... reading it one notices that the article repeatedly says "gun control never happened".
It's their blithe attempt to debunk a pillar of the "Truther" movement that is "The government orchestrated X tragedy in order to exploit it."
Here's the problem with saying "gun control never happened". Post Sandy Hook New York, Connecticut, Maryland, Colorado and other states *did* pass stricter gun control in response to the killings.
And the President himself lobbied congress heavily to pass bills that would ban certain guns.
This is like saying "Bush didn't cause 9/11 because the Patriot act never passed" or "We never invaded Iraq."
Obviously, the Sandy Hook Truthers are nuts, but saying they're wrong because "gun control didn't happen" is factually incorrect.
And then there's this...
Some of these interviews didn't sit right with the conspiracy-minded, especially those who feared that the tragedy would be used as a pretext for gun control.
Well... yes wasn't the tragedy used by Gun Control advocates as a reason to pass laws they thought would make things safer? They were pretty open about using it as a pretext for gun control.
Here we see the article being very sloppy with terminology. Basically, they're saying that because guns weren't fully banned, that there was "no gun control".
Heck don' gun control advocates go on and on about "gun control" is not "gun confiscation"? And that "nobody wants your guns"?
But here we have an article that deliberately equates gun control with mass confiscation.
What's funny is only a minor edit could have removed this bit from the article.
Just replace "gun control" with "mass confiscation" and the point would stand.