Monday, June 15, 2009

Why don't we have longer to debate?

Because then people woudl say no.

Sure, we all pay for expensive treatments for other people who are going to die soon, anyway. But we also all get to enjoy the benefits of a industrious and profitable health care industry. And even if we ourselves don’t get to live to be 90 or 100 or more, there’s a much better chance that our kids or their kids will.
And yet Washington is in such a rush to “fix” what’s not broken, that six weeks is all we have to stop this madness. Just yesterday Joe Biden admitted the Porkulus Bill was pretty much a waste. That was nearly $800 billion down the drain, because we “needed” to pass a bill so quickly that no one had the time to figure out what was really going on. Now we’re talking another $1.5 trillion in nationalized health care spending.
Shouldn’t we take a little longer than six weeks to talk about it?

And risk it not passing? Perish the thought.

And why Don't we Fix Medicare First?

Because then there'd be evidence of how well Obama's "savings" and reform would preform. Better, for them not us, to simply cram these "reforms" down all of our throats.

And here's another national health program that doesn't work.

It's like their solution to failure is to try it again, but bigger and more expensive with less individual choice.

Hope and Change.

No comments: